| 作者 |
 看看华尔街牛人－转自北京青年报 |
 |
| 所跟贴 |
I think I have to correct you on this -- chinokino - (938 Byte) 2006-11-26 周日, 06:52 (549 reads) |
sapientaf
头衔: 海归上校
声望: 学员
性别: 
加入时间: 2006/08/20
文章: 821
来自: 弯曲，上海，班格罗尔，北京，新加坡
海归分: 83000
|
|
|
作者：sapientaf 在 海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
Thanks for the follow up. You are certainly one in the knows.
As you pointed out, the rank title is different in every firm. The example title rank track I gave is just an example, but the ranking over all holds true in most firm if you take out the title(s) not applicable to a firm.
Firms has both VP and Director/Principle titles, Director/Principle is normally more senior than VP.
UBS has AD, Director, ED and MD rank track.
The main point I was trying to make is that the rank title does not mean so much in terms of someone's authority and responsibility. Therefore, it certainly very misleading to tie the rank title with a pay grade as in the article without even mention the importance of responsibility title.
Even for someone to obtain the 2nd step up rank (SVP or Director) in 10 years, it is not something worth boast about in a newspaper article.
I'm no super star, but I made Director at UBS in 3 years. Two girls, one from mainland and another from Taiwan made Director in 4 years. This was in the 90s before the ti<x>tle inflation.
作者：sapientaf 在 海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
|
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题, 不能回复主题, 不能编辑自己的文章, 不能删除自己的文章, 不能发表投票, 您 不可以 发表活动帖子在本论坛, 不能添加附件不能下载文件, |
|
|
